While
explodes in central Japan, Chicco Testa - manager-director of Rothschild Italy jackals defines those who are against the return of nuclear energy. A
Fukushima exploded one of the four buildings of the nuclear power station, following yesterday's earthquake. There is talk of not less than 45 000 people forced to leave their homes for safety reasons. NHK television showed a cloud of white smoke above the plant. And according to the issuer the explosion would have been much more powerful than initial estimates, so that the cage would be pulverized desterna containment of a reactor. The roof and walls of the building collapsed and some workers would injured ( http://www.corriere.it/esteri/11_marzo_12/giappone-esplosione-centrale-nucleare_7d19a966-4c80-11e0-8264-fe1c829faf1a.shtml ).
passes rapidly from Japan to Italy and see that "every eight years on average in Italy there is an earthquake with severe to catastrophic consequences (from" national seismic hazard "by Dario Slejko 's Experimental Geophysical Observatory of Trieste). Despite this, the Italian government has launched the race to the return of nuclear power, supported by a "comfortable" opposition (PD and IDV) in Europe voted in favor, arguing the need for such a source of energy production electricity.
But most disheartening is to hear Chicco Testa, President of the Italian Nuclear Forum, a time to drive Legambiente environmentalist and mobilization after the Chernobyl disaster (1986), and now Managing Director of Rothschild Italy, said that " Who was inspired by this tragedy [Japan, nda] to debate on nuclear power is a jackal, since we are dealing with one of the largest earthquakes in world history. That says a lot about the level of certain politicians. "
Since we, as defined by Aristotle, we see ourselves as we participate in political and government decisions, as we claim to be sovereign citizens, we see better understand the position and the reasons for Chicco Testa, former President of ENEL founder and now a site of pro nuke ' financed by Enel (from http://blog.panorama.it/italia/2010/ 11/04/chicco-testa-ha-un% E2% 80% 99idea-than-traitor / ), who as the protagonist of the construction of nuclear power, believes that nuclear power is good, and you need to do well (from http://www.enel.com/it-IT/group/production/nuclear_power/power/ ). I think there would be no wonder if the arguments of Chicco Testa arrived by the same group Rothschild, former financial adviser to AREVA and EDF, interested perhaps to finance, thanks to the numerous branches and partnerships with administrative and owned by Italian banks, the billion-dollar business of nuclear power that has already provoked the appetites of avid public money, including politicians, big business and media. Actually there are elite scientists, including former minister and current senator of the Democratic Party, who have embraced the warmth of the nucleus and the color of money companies like Enel, partner of The Future of Science, chaired by the same oncologist.
But back for a moment to our "level" and see why we support the political opposition to the return of nuclear power in Italy (several times repeated arguments):
-
Nuclear energy is needed to ensure our country to greater energy independence.
Italy, as well as the atria European countries, has no significant reserves of uranium. If I had, figuring it could produce all its electricity with nuclear power could meet about one quarter of its energy needs: the remaining three quarters of the current energy consumption are composed of fuel, not be generated by nuclear power plants. -
The soaring oil prices are countered by nuclear power.
The oil is used to derive primarily to produce chemicals and liquid fuels for transport, while nuclear power is only power. For example, France produces 78% of its electricity by nuclear power, using more oil than Italy, which, while having a similar population, has no nuclear power plants. -
Italy is forced to import electricity from France with very high prices.
The problem is not ours: it is a requirement of the French. Nuclear power plants must operate in a continuous loop and at night, when demand is lower, the electrical system beyond the Alps was a technical necessity - to ensure its stability - sort of electricity to neighboring countries. This is a sale at very low prices, highly appreciated by the Italian energy companies. -
The new generation of fission power and fusion early and always will solve the energy problem.
The feasibility and affordability of fourth-generation nuclear power plants are yet to be demonstrated: at best, is expected to be marketed between 30-40 years. -
All other countries invest in nuclear power, only Italy is a bystander, leaving out a secure energy supply and cost.
For twenty years the number of plants in the world is stable (about 440 plants), and vast majority are older second-generation plants (such as Chernobyl and Three Mile Island). The return period (ie the so-called payback time, time to return the plant occorrre energy that is needed to build it) is quite long: Australian researchers have shown that, with the most advanced technologies currently in their country it would take 7 years for a draw. In Australia itself, where are located the world's largest deposits of uranium, was never built any nuclear facility. For the standard operation of a nuclear plant are annual 160,000 tonnes of material, which will be reprocessed, so that we can derive the 160 tons of uranium needed. The 159,840 tons of waste are impregnated with chemicals used for the reprocessing and contain naturally radioactive isotopes. The cost of uranium and plutonium, an exhaustible resource, has grown remarkably, making the sourcing not cheap. The danger of these substances is very high: for example, simply inhale less than a millionth of a gram of plutonium to develop lung cancer. -
The waste facility is not a problem: they will be encased in reinforced concrete caissons and buried (land or sea).
The half-life of the radioactivity of plutonium is 24,000 years. With regard to the primary material (plutonium is produced by nuclear power: until now have been created about 1550 tons). Uranium-235 has a half life of 704 million years, and uranium-238 4.5 billion years. In contrast, the concrete becomes obsolete in a hundred years!
not to speak of the militarization of the territories (including through the imposition by the Prodi government in the dying state secret on civil works of energy production) and the intimate connection between civilian nuclear and military.
With these arguments, I do not need a scientist to show that to support the return of nuclear power in Italy are made style tricks "Heartbreaker" or it takes a "good" head (...)!
Monia Benini
Source: http://www.perilbenecomune.org/index.php?p=24:6:2:119:375
0 comments:
Post a Comment